Prediction of Connie Coate vs Thelma Long Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Coate vs T. Long

Connie Coate

AUS

1

Win

Played

5

Win

Age

106

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Thelma Long

AUS

1

Win

Played

5

Win

Age

106

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Coate 1 - 5 Long

They have played 17 sets in total, with Connie Coate winning 4 and Thelma Long winning 13. The last match between Thelma Long and Connie Coate was at the Australian Championships, 17-01-1947, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Thelma Long getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Coate	1
Long	5

Last H2H Matches:

() Australian Championships(01-17-47)

Stats

Thelma Long

Connie Coate

() Adelaide(01-04-47)

Stats

Thelma Long

Connie Coate

(SF) Melbourne(11-27-46)

Stats

Thelma Long

Connie Coate

C. Coate vs T. Long H2H Profile

C. Coate	Stats	T. Long
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
54.10% (33-28)	Career Total W/L	75.99% (516-163)
1	Clay	0
0	Grass	5
0	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	5
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Coate vs T. Long Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Connie Coate has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Thelma Long has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Connie Coate, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Thelma Long has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Connie Coate has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Thelma Long has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Connie Coate has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Thelma Long winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Connie Coate has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 78% (W/L 7/2), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 25% (W/L 1/3). Thelma Long has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 78% (W/L 144/42), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 17/7).
Player level: In the last year, Connie Coate has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Thelma Long has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 7 times before with Connie Coate winning 1 times and Thelma Long being victorious 6 times. They have played 17 sets in total, with Connie Coate winning 4 and Thelma Long winning 13.
The last match between Connie Coate and Thelma Long was at the Australian Championships, 17-01-1947, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Thelma Long getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Connie Coate and Thelma Long have played a deciding set 3 times, with Connie Coate winning 1 times and Thelma Long 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Connie Coate has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Thelma Long has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Connie Coate has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Thelma Long has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Connie Coate has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Thelma Long has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Connie Coate vs Thelma Long Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Coate vs T. Long H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Coate	Stats	T. Long
1	H2H Matches Won	6
4	Sets Won	13
56	Games Won	93
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
14% (1/7)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	86% (6/7)
33% (1/3)	Deciding Set Win %	67% (2/3)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (4/5)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (1/5)
20% (1/5)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	100% (2/2)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Coate Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sydney - 19-11-1947
Dorothy JenkinsD. Jenkins	W	6-3 7-5	Stats
SF Nancye Wynne BoltonN. Wynne	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
R3 Beryl PenroseB. Penrose	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
R4 Esme AshfordE. Ashford	W	3-6 9-7 6-4	Stats
Melbourne MCC Chps - 11-03-1947
SF Nancye Wynne BoltonN. Wynne	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

T. Long Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Launceston - 26-03-1959
F Lynette BowdenL. Bowden	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
Warrnambool - 05-03-1959
F Beverley RaeB. Rae	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
Australian Championships - 16-01-1959
R3 Eva DuldigE. Duldig	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Sydney Manly - 26-12-1958
SF Noelene TurnerN. Turner	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
F Mary HawtonM. Hawton	W	7-5 4-6 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Coate vs T. Long Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Coate	Stats	T. Long
54.10% (33/28)	YTD Win/Loss	75.99% (516/163)
51.82% (71/66)	Sets Win/Loss	73.98% (1072/377)
51.57% (642/603)	Games Win/Loss	61.78% (7928/4905)
0% (0/0)	Hard Win/Loss	70.83% (17/7)
77.78% (7/2)	Clay Win/Loss	77.42% (144/42)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	91.30% (21/2)
52.08% (25/23)	Grass Win/Loss	74.70% (248/84)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
50.00% (6/6)	Slam W/L	70.48% (74/31)
54% (33/61)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	77% (508/656)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
67% (10/15)	Deciding Set Win %	59% (79/134)
93% (27/25)	1st Set Won, Won Match	95% (490/464)
7% (27/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	5% (490/25)
24% (34/8)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	26% (168/44)